All these terminal time wasters - terminal to them if there is a goddess or two up above...
Oh that reminds me, God isn't quite as god as he seemed at first and second long long very friendly interview..
Third time unlucky " so i heard an it has to be said rather good rhetorician a few days ago wasting license payers dosh on yet more clever git chats on sky fairies....on a bit of the old theosophy.... and i rather liked the way he ended the chat with gathered religious bigotristes..." so do you think you are all worshiping the same god"? and the way he asked the question answered how he felt.
BUt I am afraid the only great rhetorician about the actual reality of the 'environment' - after a little guidance on the PEOPLE who pretend to be shepherds of it from yours truly....turns out to be rather fizzily inhuman when it comes to the notion that other equal human beings to him, equally deluded, may be worshipping the same sky fairy deep down as him...
Anyway its ALL over...
all
for ever
and ever
maybe
Noetics
In philosophy, noetics is a branch of metaphysics concerned with the study of mind as well as intellect.[1] There is also a reference to the science of noetics, which covers the field of thinking and knowing, thought and knowledge, as well as mental operations, processes, states, and products through the data of the written word.[2][3]....................................................
................Philosophy[edit]
The term itself means "the proper exercise of nous" whereas nous ("mind, understanding, intellect")[1] is described as "the highest faculty in man, through which - provided it is purified - he knows God or the inner essences or principles of created things by means of direct apprehension or spiritual perception".[4] In ancient Greek and medieval philosophy, noetic topics included the doctrine of the active intellect (Aristotle, Averroes)[5] and the doctrine of the Divine Intellect (Plotinus).[6]
The entire philosophy of noetics, which include the notions by Immanuel Kant, John Locke, René Descartes, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and Jean-Paul Sartre, among others is involved with thinking of intellection by analogy with vision.[7] In Critique of Pure Reason, Kant argues that viewing the world scientifically must be according to the Newtonian system. This constitutes the so-called "noetic skepticism" because we cannot determine if the Newtonian world is indeed the truth.[8]
Late modern philosopher and phenomenologist Franz Brentano introduced a distinction between sensory and noetic consciousness: the former describes presentations of sensory objects or intuitions, while the latter describes the thinking of concepts.[9][10] (See also Noesis (phenomenology).)
Other uses[edit]
Thinkers like Lawrence Krader consider noetics as a science, an empirical discipline that concerns itself with the processes, states, and events in the real world of space and time.[2]
Noetics is also useful in psychology such as the way it overlaps with Jamesian psychology, which deals with a range of phenomena (including emotions and feelings) that influence our thinking and knowing.[11]
